A few weeks back I wrote an article entitled “Are There Not Enough New Homes For People Moving To Portland Oregon.” In the piece I discussed the dilemma surrounding new home building, the demographic moving to the city and city dwellers dislike for infill new homes in historic neighborhoods. At the end I made a suggestion that local jurisdictions raise the bar for local builders and design in the suburbs.
My heart behind imposing this discussion was to spark thought about progressive design and how it could draw potential urbanites out to the suburbs. I really think that our county and city planners should look more into the wins that Orenco Station and Villebois have been for their respective communities. I still think that we could learn from those projects and do better. Take it to the next level by building bespoke modern homes or classically styling the homes to a vintage era.
Portland Monthly did a piece this month about an ambitious home built in the suburbs by a local production builder in a regular old suburban subdivision. Here it is in it’s entirety.
An Ambitious Custom Home in Vancouver (?!) Shows What the ‘Burbs Could Be
Can subdivisions be sexy? The typical upscale exurban or suburban development is an aesthetic nothing: great relative wealth mass-processed into generic or derivative pseudo-splendor. But a new house in Clark County, Washington—not a region known, particularly, for daring design—shows that ambitious concepts and refined executions can thrive in Cul de Sac Land, given the right forethought and collaboration.
Kevin Low, a dentist, wanted a home near his Battle Ground practice, and bought a lot hewn from a freshly subdivided farm outside Vancouver. His realtor connected him with Fieldwork Design, a Portland firm that integrates architecture, interior design, and furniture and industrial design and fabrication into its practice. “He didn’t want what was out there,” says Fieldwork’s Cornell Anderson. “He didn’t quite know what he did want.
“We were intrigued, but it did give us pause.”
At first glance, the project came with constraints. “When you buy the lot, the contractor comes attached,” Anderson says. That meant Fieldwork would collaborate with JB Homes, one of Clark County’s major spec-house and new-construction firms. “They have 10 or 12 designs, more or less off-the-rack, that they typically use,” says Fieldwork’s Tonia Hein. “So it was very different for them and very different for us, but it ended up being a great relationship.”
And within those constraints—and partnerships atypical for a firm that usually focuses on high-design urban projects or beautiful blank slates on free-standing rural properties—Fieldwork created Bluff House, a suburban jewel infused with a rural-metropolitan chic.
“We immediately had a good rapport with the client,” Anderson says. “He wanted a holistic design, which in the end meant that we designed everything—we designed the cutlery and the linens. We designed and fabricated most of the furniture. Everything was integrated into the overall concept.”
“They sort of bulldoze everything when they create one of these developments,” Anderson continues. “But we did go back and look at the old farmhouse structures that were there before. Typically, they would be arranged to create a protected outdoor space, and we adapted that idea to create a sort of central courtyard, very private and intimate.”
That inward focus means Bluff House isn’t too immediately jarring in its suburban context. Instead, it should serve as an inspiration for the thousands of home buyers looking for new construction to think beyond cookie-cutter design.
“It was a challenge we took on, with the client, the developer, and the contractor all working with us,” Anderson says. “They all became part of the team.” Portland Monthly
What Is The Message To Home Builder’s & City Planners?
What’s the take-away? There is a demand for aesthetically pleasing architecture in the culde-sacs of Portland’s suburbs. Is the demand great enough to make a difference? That is the bigger question. I wonder if there is a way to poll homeowners living in the suburbs to see if they like the aesthetic of their home or if they bought it because it was the best option offered in the area they wanted to live.
As a realtor who spends countless hours in the car with buyers my vote is the former. I often see buyers struggle between the design aesthetic they desire, the location they need, the inventory of homes available and the functionality of old vs new. I would absolutely love to see builders get on this bandwagon and not make buyers compromise any longer. Lets build more modern homes, vintage homes, architecturally significant homes in our suburbs. Give us choice!